Decision-making computer code (DMS) may be a variety of call
network to assist people and organizations with their decision-making
processes, usually leading to ranking, sorting or selecting from among
alternatives.
An early example of DMS was delineate in 1973. before the
arrival of the planet Wide net, most DMS was spreadsheet-based, with the
primary web-based DMS showing within the mid-1990stoday, a minimum of twenty
DMS product (mostly web-based) square measure accessible.
Though DMS exists for the varied stages of structuring and
finding call issues – from brain-storming issues to representing decision-maker
preferences and reaching choices – most DMS focuses on selecting from among a
bunch of alternatives characterised on multiple criteria or attributes.
Purpose
DMS may be a tool that's supposed to support the analysis
concerned in decision-making processes, to not replace it. "DMS ought to
be wont to support the method, not because the driving or dominating
force." DMS frees users "from the technical implementation details
[of the decision-making methodology utilized – mentioned within the next
section], permitting them to specialise in the basic worth judgements".even
so, DMS mustn't use blindly. "Before employing a computer code, it's
necessary to possess a sound data of the adopted methodology and of the choice
drawback at hand."
Decision-making methods
Most call-making processes supported by DMS square measure
supported decision analysis, most typically multi-criteria deciding (MCDM).
MCDM involves evaluating and mixing alternatives' characteristics on 2 or a lot
of criteria or attributes so as to rank, kind or choose between among the
alternatives.
DMS employs a range of MCDM methods;widespread examples
embrace (and see the table below):
Aggregated Indices organization methodology (AIRM)
Analytic Hierarchy method (AHP)
Analytic network method (ANP, Associate in Nursing extension
of AHP)
Elimination and selection Expressing Reality (ELECTRE)
Multi-attribute international logical thinking of quality
(MAGIQ)
Multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT)
Potentially all pairwise rankings of all attainable
alternatives (PAPRIKA)
Preference Ranking Organization methodology for Enrichment
analysis (PROMETHEE)
Simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART)
Naturally, there square measure vital variations between
these methods[6][8] and, consequently, the DMS implementing them. Such
variations include:
The extent to that the choice drawback is broken into a
hierarchy of sub-problems;
Whether or not pairwise comparisons of alternatives and/or
criteria square measure wont to elicit decision-makers' preferences;
The use of interval scale or quantitative relation scale
measurements of decision-makers' preferences;
The number of criteria included;
The number of alternatives evaluated, starting from many
(finite) to infinite;
The extent to that numerical scores square measure wont to
worth and/or rank alternatives;
The extent to that incomplete rankings (relative to finish
rankings) of alternatives square measure made.
Software features
In addition to serving to decision-makers to rank, kind or
choose between among alternatives, DMS product usually embrace a range of
further options and tools;[3][4] examples include:
Time analysis and time optimisation
Sensitivity analysis and mathematical logic calculations
Risk aversion activity
Group analysis (teamwork)
Graphic or visual presentation tools
No comments:
Post a Comment